Meetings
NDM8282 Welsh Conservatives Debate - Accounting practices at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
This page gives details of any meetings held which will, or did, discuss the matter, and includes links to the relevant Papers, Agendas and Minutes.
Note: Meeting Agenda can change at short notice. Particularly where future meeting dates are indicated more than a week in advance. Please check before planning to attend a Committee Meeting that the item you are interested in has not been moved.
Meeting: 07/06/2023 - Plenary (Item 6)
Welsh Conservatives Debate - Accounting practices at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
NDM8282 Darren Millar (Clwyd West)
To propose that the Senedd:
1. Believes that the Ernst & Young forensic
report of accounting issues at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board should
be published in full and be in the public domain.
2. Calls upon Betsi Cadwaladr University
Health Board to publish the Ernst & Young report.
3. Requests, given the findings in the
Ernst & Young report, that a wider and independent review be undertaken to
provide assurances that:
a) the practices identified at the Betsi
Cadwaladr University Health Board are not happening in other NHS organisations
in Wales; and
b) financial years
prior to those reviewed by Ernst & Young were not affected by similar
practices.
The following amendment was tabled:
Amendment 1 Lesley
Griffiths (Wrexham)
Delete all and replace with:
To propose that the Senedd:
1.
Recognises the significant interest in the Ernst & Young forensic
report of accounting issues at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board and
notes calls for it to be published.
2.
Notes that Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board is progressing the
management of the issues raised in the Ernst & Young report in line with
existing procedures and policies and is seeking legal advice re its
publication.
3. Notes the role of Audit Wales in providing assurance on the management of public money and the WG intention to undertake a lessons learnt exercise and disseminate its findings across NHS organisations.
Minutes:
The
item started at 16.07
Voting on the motion and amendments under this item was deferred
until Voting Time.
A vote was taken on the motion without amendment:
NDM8282 Darren Millar
(Clwyd West)
To propose that the Senedd:
1. Believes that the Ernst & Young forensic report of
accounting issues at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board should be
published in full and be in the public domain.
2. Calls upon Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board to publish
the Ernst & Young report.
3. Requests, given the findings in the Ernst & Young report,
that a wider and independent review be undertaken to provide assurances that:
a) the practices identified at the Betsi Cadwaladr University Health
Board are not happening in other NHS organisations in Wales; and
b) financial years prior to those reviewed by Ernst & Young
were not affected by similar practices.
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
24 |
0 |
25 |
49 |
As required by Standing Order 6.20 the Presiding Officer exercised
her casting vote by voting against the motion. Therefore, the motion was not
agreed.
The following amendments were tabled:
Amendment
1 Lesley Griffiths (Wrexham)
Delete
all and replace with:
To
propose that the Senedd:
1. Recognises
the significant interest in the Ernst & Young forensic report of accounting
issues at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board and notes calls for it to be
published.
2. Notes
that Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board is progressing the management of
the issues raised in the Ernst & Young report in line with existing
procedures and policies and is seeking legal advice re its publication.
3. Notes
the role of Audit Wales in providing assurance on the management of public
money and the WG intention to undertake a lessons learnt exercise and
disseminate its findings across NHS organisations.
A vote
was taken on amendment 1:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
24 |
0 |
25 |
49 |
As required by Standing Order 6.20 the Presiding Officer exercised
her casting vote by voting against the amendment. Therefore, the amendment was
not agreed.
As the Senedd did not
agree the motion without amendment, and did not agree the amendment tabled to
the motion, the motion was therefore not agreed.