Decision details
Welsh Liberal Democrats Debate
Decision Maker: Plenary - Fourth Assembly
Status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Purpose:
Debates are one of the
most frequent items of business on the Plenary
agenda. Many types of debate are brought forward in Plenary, including:
- Opposition party debates on a topic of their choice;
Other than in the case of Government debates, the time allocated for all other types of debates and their frequency are determined by the Business Committee
Decision:
The item started at 16.25
Voting
on the motion and amendments under this item was deferred until Voting Time.
A vote was taken on
the motion without amendment:
NDM5188
Aled Roberts (North Wales)
To
propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1.
Expresses concern that patients in Wales are not able to access the newest and
most innovative medicines and treatments available to their counterparts across
the UK;
2.
Welcomes the creation of a Welsh Health Technology Fund but regrets the lack of
investment in new, innovative technologies from the £5million allocation for
the financial year 2012-2013;
3.
Notes that the pharmaceutical industry invested £4.4billion in UK research and
development in 2009 which is more than any other industry sector and believes
that NHS Wales needs an environment that is receptive to innovation in order to
compete effectively for clinical trials at a global level;
4.
Believes that spending on modern medicines should be viewed as an investment
rather than a cost and therefore regrets that in 2011 new medicines used in
primary care accounted for only 0.5% of total NHS expenditure in Wales; and
5.
Notes that Wales is forecast to gain savings of around £186million between
2011-2015 due to Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) and calls on the Welsh Government to
invest some of this money into the Health Technology Fund, to support
engagement with the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group (AWMSG) and National
Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) so that more patients in
Wales can benefit from the latest medicines and treatments.
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
14 |
0 |
36 |
50 |
The
motion without amendment was not agreed.
The
following amendments were tabled:
Amendment
1 - Jocelyn Davies (South Wales East)
In
point 1, after ‘in Wales’ insert ‘, especially those with rare diseases,’.
A vote was taken on Amendment 1:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
14 |
0 |
36 |
50 |
Amendment 1 was not
agreed.
Amendment
2 - William Graham (South Wales East)
In
point 2, delete all after ‘regrets’ and replace with:
a)
the lack of investment in new, innovative technologies
from the £5 million allocation for the financial year 2012-2013;
b)
that the Fund does not address the poor accessibility
of modern cancer treatments for Welsh patients when compared to other parts of
the UK.
A vote was taken on Amendment 2:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
11 |
0 |
39 |
50 |
Amendment 2 was not
agreed.
Amendment
3 - William Graham (South Wales East)
Add
as new point at end of motion:
Calls on the Welsh
Government to ensure that the Welsh Health Technology Fund extends access to
modern cancer treatments for patients in Wales.
A vote was taken on Amendment 3:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
16 |
0 |
34 |
50 |
Amendment 3 was not
agreed.
Amendment
4 - William Graham (South Wales East)
Add
as new point at end of motion:
Notes
that the Welsh Government’s record-breaking real terms cuts to the Welsh NHS
budget have the potential to jeopardise the access to innovative medicines and
treatments for patients.
A vote was taken on Amendment 4:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
11 |
0 |
39 |
50 |
Amendment 4 was not
agreed.
As the Assembly did
not agree the motion without amendment, and did not agree the amendments tabled
to the motion, the motion was therefore not agreed.
Publication date: 13/03/2013
Date of decision: 13/03/2013
Decided at meeting: 13/03/2013 - Plenary - Fourth Assembly