Decision details
Welsh Liberal Democrats Debate
Decision Maker: Plenary - Fourth Assembly
Status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Purpose:
Debates are one of the
most frequent items of business on the Plenary
agenda. Many types of debate are brought forward in Plenary, including:
- Opposition party debates on a topic of their choice;
Other than in the case of Government debates, the time allocated for all other types of debates and their frequency are determined by the Business Committee
Decision:
The item started at 16.45
Voting
on the motion and amendments under this item was deferred until Voting Time.
A vote was taken on
the motion without amendment:
NDM5228
Aled Roberts (North Wales)
To
propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1.
Believes that future support for school standards in Wales must focus on
allowing every pupil to reach their full potential and give schools the power
to drive standards up.
2.
Notes that analysis by the Institute of Welsh Affairs highlights that where schools
focus on the trajectory of its pupils as much as on their absolute standard of
attainment, with the appropriate use of internal evaluation and monitoring,
standards can be raised in schools on an individual pupil basis.
3.
Welcomes the commitment by the Welsh Government to ensure that Estyn reports on how effectively the Pupil Deprivation
Grant is being used by schools to narrow the attainment gap between pupils from
disadvantaged and more affluent backgrounds.
4.
Calls on the Welsh Government to:
a)
develop an individual pupil monitoring programme to
measure pupils’ progress, allowing schools to target efforts at those pupils
who are not meeting their potential
b)
substantially increase funding for the Pupil Deprivation Grant and ensure that
schools publicise how this funding has been spent, to encourage accountability,
effective targeting and the sharing of best practice; and
c)
reform the school banding system to ensure that it
measures school performance with regard to individual pupil performance, including
re-structuring the system to demonstrate how well schools are achieving in
supporting pupils to meet their own potential.
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
4 |
0 |
44 |
48 |
The
motion without amendment was not agreed.
The
following amendments were tabled:
Amendment
1 - William Graham (South Wales East)
In
point 1, after ‘pupil’ insert ‘, regardless of background or ability,’
A vote was taken on Amendment 1:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
50 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
Amendment 1 was agreed.
Amendment
2 - Jocelyn Davies (South Wales East)
In
point 1 add ‘and educational bodies’ after ‘give schools’
A vote was taken on Amendment 2:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
50 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
Amendment 2 was agreed.
Amendment
3 - William Graham (South Wales East)
Delete
point 3.
A vote was taken on Amendment 3:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
12 |
0 |
38 |
50 |
Amendment 3 was not
agreed.
Amendment
4 - Lesley Griffiths (Wrexham)
Delete
point 4.
A vote was taken on Amendment 4:
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
26 |
0 |
24 |
50 |
Amendment 4 was agreed.
As amendment 4 was agreed, amendments 5, 6,
7, 8, 9 and 10 were de-selected.
A vote was taken on the motion as amended:
NDM5228 Aled Roberts (North Wales)
To
propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1.
Believes that future support for school standards in Wales must focus on
allowing every pupil, regardless of background or ability, to reach their full
potential and give schools and educational bodies the power to drive standards
up.
2.
Notes that analysis by the Institute of Welsh Affairs highlights that where schools
focus on the trajectory of its pupils as much as on their absolute standard of
attainment, with the appropriate use of internal evaluation and monitoring,
standards can be raised in schools on an individual pupil basis.
3.
Welcomes the commitment by the Welsh Government to ensure that Estyn reports on how effectively the Pupil Deprivation
Grant is being used by schools to narrow the attainment gap between pupils from
disadvantaged and more affluent backgrounds.
|
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
|
46 |
4 |
0 |
50 |
The
motion as amended was agreed.
Publication date: 01/05/2013
Date of decision: 01/05/2013
Decided at meeting: 01/05/2013 - Plenary - Fourth Assembly